
Why is abrupt dry off better for dairy cow and management?
In recent years, the pressure on livestock farmers around (the way of) dry-off has increased. Genetic selection, nutrition, and overall management have contributed to higher milk yields. However, this also made the milk cessation at the end of lactation more challenging (for high producing cows). The dry period is crucial for ensuring optimal milk yield and udder health in the following lactation. During this time, cows face an elevated risk of developing new (intramammary) infections (figure 1), particularly at the onset of the dry period (Vilar & Rajala-Schultz, 2020).
Using conventional methods to stimulate dry off, has been a commonly used strategy to maintain udder health during the dry period. However, with growing concern about antimicrobial resistance and increased customer interest in animal welfare dry cow management has become even more complex. The dairy industry is now tasked with balancing animal health, welfare and production sustainability into these intensive systems.

Dry-off methods
There are two primary approaches for milk cessation to dry-off.
- Gradual dry-off (a.k.a. intermittent milking); involves progressively decreasing the frequency of milking over a set period until the final milking before the dry period begins.
- Abrupt dry-off; which involves stopping milking entirely on a predetermined day based on the cow’s expected calving date and the desired duration of the dry period.
The type of milk cessation method implemented varies widely across countries and herds. Abrupt dry-off is a widely adopted approach as utilized on 74% of the dairy farms in the US, 73% in Germany (Bertulat et al., 2015) and 83% in Scotland (Fujiwara et al., 2018). From a management perspective, abrupt dry-off is straightforward to implement, particularly in large herds with year-round calving, as the process can be completed in a single day. However, it might be more difficult in seasonal herds; managing the labour demands of drying off potentially hundreds of cows in a short period of time. In Finland for example 96% of dairy farmers (Vilar et al., 2018) apply a gradual dry-off protocol (Vilar & Rajala-Schultz, 2020).
Effects of abrupt dry-off on milk yield and SCC
It is often believed that abrupt dry-off has a negative impact on milk yield and somatic cell count (SCC). However, various studies showed that abrupt dry-off did not significantly affect milk yield or somatic cell count in the following lactation in comparison to gradual dry-off (Gott et al., 2017; Combs et al., 2024). Furthermore it is found that cows that are abruptly dried off with high production) continue their higher dry matter intake during the dry period and carry this behaviour into the next lactation. This is beneficial for milk production, as it results in a higher milk yield at the start of the next lactation. Also, a higher dry matter intake during the dry period has a positive effect on the energy levels and thereby the overall health of the dairy cow.
Duration of dry period
The duration of the dry period is a crucial variable for a successful start of the subsequent lactation. Research showed that for the cows with a shorter dry period a decreased milk yield was measured in the next lactation, particularly when the cows were abruptly dried-off.
Cows with shorter than a 45-day dry period produced 3.8 kg/d less milk than cows that were dry ≥65 days and 1.3 kg/d less milk than cows that were dry 55 to 64 days. Cows that were dried-off abruptly and had short dry periods (<45 days) produced significantly less milk than abruptly dried-off cows with longer short periods. No differences in milk yields were observed among gradually dried-off cows with different dry period lengths. No direct impact was found for the method of milk cessation in relation to udder health and productivity.
What are the benefits of abrupt dry-off?
As found by Gott et al. (2017) and Combs et al. (2024).
» Optimal milk production
By continuing to milk cows at their full production capacity until the last day before dry-off, farmers can maximise milk yield in the current lactation while maintaining an optimal dry-off period of 40 to 60 days.
» Better dry matter intake (DMI)
Highly productive cows have a higher DMI during dry-off that persists into the next lactation.
» No increase in SCC at dry-off or in the subsequent lactation
In gradually dried-off cows higher SCC levels were found at dry-off than in cows that were dried-off abruptly. Additionally, high milk yield at dry off is not associated with an increased SCC in the following lactation.
Impact of abrupt dry-off on stress levels
Even though abrupt dry-off is commonly used in various countries and farms, research shows that there are correlations between abrupt dry-off and dairy cow stress levels, due to udder pressure. As high producing cows seem to experience greater stress during dry-off compared to low-yielding cows, particularly in case of abrupt cessation of milking (Vilar & Rajala-Schultz, 2018; Bertulat et al., 2013). In most cases this stress is expressed in terms of lower feed intake and increase in blood NEFA levels (ketone bodies).
To help farmers in the process of abrupt dry-off and make this process more comfortable for the dairy cows, AHV has designed a revolutionary dry-off solution. The new AHV StopLac Tablet, which is specifically designed to support dairy cows during the dry-off period.
AHV StopLac Tablet
It is commonly know that the transition to a dry cow leads to stress and increased udder pressure, which in turn can lead to discomfort and it raises the risk of milk leakage and bacterial contamination.
By reducing milk production, through temporarily adjusting rumen fermentation, the StopLac Tablet helps alleviate udder pressure, improving the cow’s comfort post dry-off. This promotes an optimal dry-off period, benefiting both udder health and calf development.
References
Bertulat, S., Fischer-Tenhagen, C., Suthar, V., Möstl, E., Isaka, N., & Heuwieser, W. (2013). Measurement of fecal glucocorticoid metabolites and evaluation of udder characteristics to estimate stress after sudden dry-off in dairy cows with different milk yields. Journal of Dairy Science, 96(6), 3774–3787. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2012-6425
Bertulat, S., Fischer-Tenhagen, C., & Heuwieser, W. (2015). A survey of drying-off practices on commercial dairy farms in northern Germany and a comparison to science-based recommendations. Veterinary Record Open, 2(1), e000068. https://doi.org/10.1136/vetreco-2014-000068
Combs, G. J., Flemming, T. A., Goetz, B. M., Rodríguez-Jimenez, S., Opgenorth, J., Mayorga, E. J., Buol, B. M., Schuling, S. E., Schimek, D. E., & Baumgard, L. H. (2024). 2386 – Pre-dry-off milk yield and its association with future metabolism and productivity. Abstract of the 2024 American Dairy Science Association Annual Meeting. Journal of dairy science, 107(1), 316.
Fujiwara, M., Haskell, M. J., Macrae, A. I., & Rutherford, K. M. D. (2018). Survey of dry cow management on UK commercial dairy farms. Veterinary Record, 183(9), 297. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.104755
Gott, P. N., Rajala-Schultz, P. J., Schuenemann, G. M., Proudfoot, K. L., & Hogan, J. S. (2017). Effect of gradual or abrupt cessation of milking at dry-off on milk yield and somatic cell score in the subsequent lactation. Journal of Dairy Science, 100(3), 2080–2089. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2016-11444
Vilar, M. J. & Rajala-Schultz, P. J. (2018). Short communication: Drying-off practices and use of dry cow therapy in Finnish dairy herds. Journal of Dairy Science, 101(9), 7487–7493. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2018-14742
Vilar, M. J., & Rajala-Schultz, P. J. (2020). Dry-off and dairy cow udder health and welfare: Effects of different milk cessation methods. The Veterinary Journal, 262, 105503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2020.105503
Have a question?
Our experienced Farm Consultants and Technical Veterinary Experts are here to address any queries you have regarding your herd health.
Fill out our brief contact form to receive a call from our friendly team.
EN – Get in touch
"*" indicates required fields